<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Comments on Our Opinion - the Better Business Bureau (BBB) is not always useful</title>
		<link>https://www.fiscalrangers.com/2008/07/our-opinion---t.html</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>http://www.typepad.com/</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="https://www.fiscalrangers.com/2008/07/our-opinion---t/comments/rss.xml" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:45:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
		<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
			<title>Suzanne commented on &#39;Our Opinion - the Better Business Bureau (BBB) is not always useful&#39;</title>
			<link>https://www.fiscalrangers.com/2008/07/our-opinion---t.html?cid=124435804#comment-6a00d834632be569e200e553c1fa6c8833</link>
			<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator> 
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.fiscalrangers.com/2008/07/our-opinion---t.html?cid=124435804#comment-6a00d834632be569e200e553c1fa6c8833</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:13:55 -0400</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree on both counts! It&amp;#39;s VERY difficult to get good info out of BBB&amp;#39;s and your story sounds familiar. The process is so difficult that most people just give up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for IPA, I worked for a rival company, and in MANY cases when we went in to talk to prospects, we heard story after story about our unethical competitors, and it kept most from getting the services they desperately needed. They were just too jaded from their previous experience.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ripoff Report is clearly the way to go, since like you said, you can search multiple ways and see a long term view of a company&amp;#39;s policies, problems and how they were resolved (or not).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- ph=1 -->
