Apparently, Obama is gloating about his Iran deal regarding nuclear weapons.
He and some of the US press are gloating about it and using a US tailored
version of the agreement.
However, a conservative paper translated the original Iranian version of the
agreement and it is much more against interests of the US.
Thus the Obama administration provided a whitewash version without the true
conditions agreed to.
I was unable to find any articles in the Daily Commercial or Orlando
Sentinel that discussed to original version wording or Obama's lies about
it's contents.
Read and wonder how Obama or the Democrats in power can lie as much as they
do about the much harsher terms in the Iranian version of the agreement.
Why aren't more press speaking out about these lies?
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/04/05/world-view-texts-of-ir
an-nuclear-deal-differ-in-english-and-farsi-versions/Since the above link has other articles, here is the full excerpt on Obama's
lies:
Texts of Iran nuclear deal differ in English and Farsi
versions
Iran's press has been euphoric and ecstatic over this week's
nuclear agreement between Iran and Western negotiators. Many newspapers are
devoting entire editors to the agreement. A typical headline is, "Our nation
is on the cusp of a great victory."
The American mainstream media, who are overwhelmingly
Democratic and always support President Obama no matter what he does, have
stayed in line by endorsing the deal, calling it "historic" or "a great
victory for Obama's legacy."
However, the more conservative New York Post hired a Farsi
expert to compare the Farsi version of the agreement, published by Iran,
versus the English version of the agreement, published by the White House,
and found some significant differences. Indeed, it is clear from the two
text versions that the claims of complete agreement between Iran and the
West are simply not true.
* The Iranian text uses different verb forms when describing Western
and Iranian commitments. For example, the Iranian commitment, "The nuclear
facilities at Fordow shall be developed into a center for nuclear research
and advanced Physics" is written in the passive voice without specifying any
time frame. But the Persian text uses a very aggressive active verb mood for
Western commitments: "The United Nations shall abrogate its previous
resolutions while the United States and the European Union will immediately
lift sanctions [imposed on] financial, banking, insurance, investment and
all services related to oil, gas, petrochemicals and car industry."
* In some cases, the two texts directly contradict each other. The
American statement claims that Iran has agreed not to use advanced
centrifuges, each of which could do the work of 10 old ones. The Iranian
text, however, says that "on the basis of solutions found, work on advanced
centrifuges shall continue on the basis of a 10-year plan."
To use the old joke, this is actually déjà vu all over
again. There was an interim nuclear agreement that Iran signed with the West
in November 2013 that had similar problems. The full text of that agreement
has never been published. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that,
under the agreement, Iran had no right to enrich uranium, while Iran's
foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif gloated that Iran had preserved its
right to enrich uranium. The White House published a "summary," but Iran
completely rejected
the White House
summary as "not true." Then, in January 2014, Iran disclosed that there was
a secret side agreement to the nuclear agreement. The White House first
confirmed this, saying that the side agreement would be made public, and
then denied that there was a secret side agreement.
So it appears that we are starting off with the same kinds
of lies and deceptions that were part of the 2013 interim agreement.
There is another thing bothering me. During his "mission
accomplished" televised victory press conference earlier this week after the
deal was announced, President Obama referred to a fatwa supposedly issued by
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei that Iran's nuclear
program is entirely peaceful, and that forbids the development of nuclear
weapons. The fatwa supposedly says, "the production, stockpiling and use of
nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam and that the Islamic Republic of
Iran shall never acquire these weapons."
The problem is that nobody has ever seen this fatwa, because
it does not exist, according to a number of Iranian and Arab writers have
researched the issue. "18-Mar-14 World View - Does Iran's anti-nuclear fatwa
really exist, as claimed?"
So the question is: Why did Obama refer to this nonexistent
fatwa? Is he simply lying because he can always get away with lying? Does he
think the reporters in the mainstream media are so stupid that they won't
even check it out? Well, if that's what Obama thinks, then Obama is probably
right.
At any rate, it is pretty clear that President Obama is
willing to say and do anything to get the final deal with Iran ratified by
the July 1 deadline. We'll see what he's willing to do as the weeks go by.
BBC and New York
Post
and Memri (17-Mar-2014)
and Memri
(4-Oct-2013)
Here are some articles about Obama's lies
Charles Krauthammer - deal is one sided - we remove sanctions on Iran and
they give up nothing
http://www.westernjournalism.com/charles-krauthammer-highlights-astonishing-
aspect-iranian-nuclear-agreement/Netanyahu - "Deal paves Iran's path to the Bomb"
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/nationworld/chi-netanyahu-deal-paves-ira
ns-path-to-the-bomb-20150403-embeddedvideo.html
Vance Jochim
[email protected]
YouTube Channel "FiscalRangersFlorida"
